In “Roland Barthes,” Barthes writes that Michelet attracted him by founding “an ethnology of France,” that is, by his skill in questioning historically the most natural objects, such as faces, food, clothes, complexion. But “Michelet” takes us back, somewhat mercifully, to an earlier period when Barthes was both more accessible and more politically committed.
#Roland barthes michelet pdf series
“S/Z,” Barthes’ reading-in actuality his reconstruction-of Balzac’s short story “Sarrasine,” signals a series of more and more personal, loosely assembled, and hedonistic works, such as “The Pleasure of the Text, Roland Barthes” (by himself) and “A Lover’s Discourse.”Īlbeit less systematic, these later volumes are not much easier to read than those of Barthes’ militant phase. He abandoned the unconscious collective meanings he traced, for example, in Racine’s tragedies for an approach in which there would be no final “signified” (meaning) lying behind the various “signifiers” that constitute a literary text. Around 1970, Barthes’ writing evolved into a more radical phase.
For those of us who read Roland Barthes’ “Michelet par lui-meme” shortly after its publication in France in 1954, reading the recent translation by Richard Howard feels like a pilgrimage-a proper phrase in view of the Barthes cult that developed and dominated the literary world for the last 25 years.īarthes, who died in 1980, remains best known to the general reader as the brilliant structuralist and semiologist of “The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies,” “The Fashion System” and “The Empire of Signs.” In the mid-60s, literature professors saw in him a modern Saint George undaunted by repeated assaults from the old-fashioned French Sorbonne establishment.
0 kommentar(er)
